British archive confirms Turkey’s objective was Cyprus division

Foreign Office documents, released on Thursday concerning ex-British colonies, confirm that Turkey’s objective in Cyprus has always been the island’s division.

The documents contain extensive references to British scenarios on how to achieve this objective.

UK Permanent Representative to the UN Pierson Dixon writes in a letter to the Foreign Office on June 21, 1957, that the UN would make it very difficult for London to apply partition.

Such a policy, he added, would face great difficulties without US support.

In another letter that was brought to light, Cyprus Deputy Governor George Sinclair writes to Governor John Harding on potential solutions on the island, prior to a May 1957 meeting at Governor’s House.

Sinclair refers to a Turkish proposal, providing for a majority of Greek Cypriots living under Turkish rule in a “Turkish sector” and a Turkish Cypriot minority living under Greek rule in a “Greek sector”.

It was noted that this arrangement, however, would allow 4/5 of the population, consisting of “hostile Greeks” to remain in an area of great military significance for Turkey.

If the island were divided right away between Greeks and Turks, leaving only some pockets of British sovereignty, the document continues, the relocation of the population would create problems. The difference in such an eventuality would be that Greece and Turkey would have the responsibility to find an arrangement. The UK’s responsibility in such a case would be to ensure that Athens and Ankara agree on the dividing lines.

Another document says that Turkish Cypriot leader Fazil Kucuk noted after a meeting with Turkey’s Foreign Minister on January 16, 1957, that the Turkish Cypriot community would not agree to anything but partition.

Moreover, Colonial Secretary John Reddaway confirms on June 29, 1957, that the Turkish government opposed a unitary state in Cyprus and expressed his belief that the British government shared, in principle, a partition-based solution.

The documents show that the US has asked the late Archbishop Makarios, who later on was elected first President of Cyprus, to renounce violence during the armed EOKA struggle.

According to the documents, the US Ambassador in Athens at the time met Makarios on May 3, 1957, who was returning to Cyprus from exile in Seychelles, and asked him to renounce violence, inviting him to adopt an approach, more compatible with his religious capacity.

More documents reveal that the British were thinking of allowing Makarios to return from Athens to Cyprus and place him under solitary confinement at the Stavrovouni Monastery, in Larnaca District.

The documents also suggest that the British were short of interrogators during the EOKA armed struggle in the mid 1950s and were thinking of employing people from Turkey. According to a relevant document, in May 1956 there were only five interrogators while 21 were needed.

Moreover, released documents indicate that the possibility of Cyprus joining NATO was raised during consultations on the membership of Greece and Turkey to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in September 1951.

During the same period, British commander of Allied forces in the Middle East General Robertson briefed Cyprus Governor on the possibility of transferring the British headquarters to Cyprus.

The Governor appears to have disagreed with this option, due to the cost it entailed.

The documents contain references to General Georgios Grivas, leader of EOKA, following the capture of EOKA fighters and the discovery of Grivas’ personal belongings.

Cyprus Governor Harding, in a letter to the Colonial Office informed London that in case of capturing Grivas, dead or alive, a smear campaign would follow, presenting him as a ruthless mercenary who brought to Cyprus the most extreme elements of Greek civil war.

Harding added that he would also try to project Makarios’ handling of the Cyprus question as rather inefficient, and as a man who chose a “bully” as his main aide and put at risk the entire Greek Orthodox Church.

Source: famagusta-gazette.com

No related news.

  • Kasomoulis

    Well, there you have it! Another debacle made in Britain. For our Turkish friends the proof that EOKA was designated an “armed struggle” to free the island from the British. NOT A WAR AGAINST THE TURKISH CYPRIOTS!!
    Also Turkey has no cover anymore to claim they care about the Turkish Cypriots! This should be noted by the countries neighboring Turkey. There is not a single true in the Turkish claims that they actually care about the so called “Turkish peoples in other countries”. It is all a sham to misinform the Turkish public for political support inside Turkey! It has always been like that! Because of the continuity of this Turkish national behavior, it has to be part of the Turkish culture and not isolated incidents that do happen in some countries to overcome a crisis.
    I have a question for those that blame NATO for all ills; would Cyprus be in the current predicament if she was part of NATO ?
    Britain, of course had no interest in Cyprus being part of NATO because it was not in Britain’s global interests. Thus the current problem – does it sound like “made in Britain?’. I would be interested to seeing the rest of the documents that are currently still in the archives held as classified.

  • Leonidas

    Good old Great Britain, Divide and Concur Champion of the world!
    Trying to put sole blame on Turkey and the USA for the partition the Islands

    A Greek Island with the vast majority of the population being Greek and Christian for +2000 years.

    The Turkish minority a remnant of the Ottoman occupation from the 1500′s

    The Turkish minority is given huge veto rights by Britain to frustrate the legitimate political aspirations of the majority of the Greek citizens.

    Why would Britain (and the USA) allow the minority to have a say over the majority, in Cyprus, but in South Africa and Zimbabwe the minority European communities were not allowed the same privileges. If One Man One vote was good enough in Africa and the rest of the world, why not in Cyprus in 1960.
    When Saddam invaded tiny Kuwait, Britain, the USA and the UN ejected Irak from Kuwait. Why could Britain, the USA and the UN not do the same to the Turkish invader.

    Self serving back stabbing Hypocrites, you wanted to keep the bases in Cyprus under your control so you ensured this objective by creating tension between the Greek and Turkish communities and by extension Greece and Turkey and in the political mess that followed you stole the bases. Classic divide and concur tactic.

    How could you stand and watch while your Christian European brothers were being invaded and murdered by the Turk. And following the illegal invasion you allow the Turk to import thousands of settlers to the island in the effort to change the demographics of the island and complicating matters even further.

    But we Greeks should not be surprised by our western European Christian brothers, they have a history of back stabbing us when it comes to the Turk:
    1. The Fourth Crusade (1202–1204) was originally intended to conquer Muslim-controlled Jerusalem by means of an invasion through Egypt. Instead, they invaded and sacked the Christian Orthodox city of Constantinople, this was the beginning of the end of the city which later fell to the Ottoman Turk in the 1400′s, again with the west offering no help
    2. In 1922 the Greek Community of Western Turkey (having lived there for 2000 years) were massacred and the survivors were deported to Greece by the Turks.

    Ask the Indian people they can also share some stories about the British, also the Afrikaans people of South Africa they can also tell you about the British during the Boer War, where the British imprisoned their women and children into concentration camps where they were starved and thousands died from hunger and sickness. Dirty Bastard Pommies

    • Kasomoulis

      Well said Leo!

      • Dnesys

        Agree… We are Eastern (this is my belief and to state as to there being no confusion I’m Christian part of the Greek Orthodox Church). The west claims that we are part of that sphere… Yeah right as you mentioned Leonidas

        “1. The Fourth Crusade (1202–1204) was originally intended to conquer Muslim-controlled Jerusalem by means of an invasion through Egypt. Instead, they invaded and sacked the Christian Orthodox city of Constantinople, this was the beginning of the end of the city which later fell to the Ottoman Turk in the 1400′s, again with the west offering no help”

        This was the ultimate betrayal and ever since we have forces on the left “the so called friend – the West… and on the right “the Zionist using the Turk”.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Phoevos Dean Plassaras

          If you want to comment on historical events, at least get educated about them.

          The real reason for the sacking of Constantinople during the 4th Crusade were the significant debts which Byzantium had with the Venetian fleet which Byzantium refused to pay on the basis that Constantinople was unbreachable and thus unconquerable. And because the Venetians were carrying the soldiers of the 4th Crusade who had to pay them, the idea was to collect an old debt in lieu of payment. The looting of Constantinople was as much a product of Byzantine stupidity as a product of crusaders’ disgrace.

          Of course it was wrong when Christians went then against Christians because it did two major things. It developed an intense dislike between the Catholic and Orthodox faith to the point of Patriarchs later proclaiming “better the turban of the Turk than the tiara of the Pope”. And thus basically delivered Byzantium to the Turks.

          It’s that intense dislike and the schism of the two Christian Churches which is more responsible for the 400 years under Turkish yoke. Simply put the orthodox clergy was given more privileges under the Turks plus its independence as a Church, rather than submitting to the hated Rome.

          And while Europe progressed under the rediscovered Greek letters and science, we languished under barbarian occupation all for the egoism of the Church.

          Finally, West means “west of Persia”. Greece never will be be part of the east. We are as much anti-East as one can get. We the Greeks ARE the West.

          • Leonidas

            No Sir you are wrong, please check your facts again.

            The 4th Crusade Proclaimed by Pope Innocent the 3rd to liberate the Holy Land from the “infidel”, was doomed from the start as it lacked sufficient funds. The Crusaders had found them selves short of cash to pay the Venetians the cost of the 480 ships that they were using. Seeing an opportunity the Venetians struck a deal with the Crusaders, that if they liberated the port of Zara from the Hungarians they would oblige the Crusaders with a reduction in the price. In 1203 a young pretender to the Byzantine throne, Alexius the nephew of the Emperor struck a deal with the Crusaders to depose his uncle and install him as emperor. In exchange he promised funds for the crusade, extra manpower and Byzantine immediate submission to the pope and the adoption of Catholicism. However, the young Alexius was unable keep his lavish promises to the Crusaders who were by that time getting impatient and on the 9th of April 1204 the crusaders relaunched their attack on the city and they proceeded for 3 days a vicious orgy of rape and pillage, I quote “an evil explosion of of frustrated energy , a trashing the like of which the medieval world had not seen since the barbarian invasions of the west, and much of the Crusaders spleen was vented against the Byzantine church”.
            The sad part of the story is that the leader of the 4th Crusade Geoffrey de Villehardouin & the “Doge” (Leader) of Venice were present and could have AVERTED the catastrophe by ordering the Crusaders back onto the ships and sail for the holy land. However they took the opportunity to plunder the riches of the city and install a yes man on the Byzantine throne. For the sad details of the destruction of the city and its churches read the eye witness account of Nicetas Choniates an educated noble man of the city. And most interesting of all read what Pope Innocent the 3 wrote about this tragedy and the barbaric actions of the Crusaders. He was “dismayed” at the “barbaric conquest of Constantinople”.
            There was no dept in favor of Venice other than the “promise” of a traitor with ambitions on another mans throne. The destruction of Constantinople by the 4th Crusade was a clever scheme by the Venetians to eliminate a business competitor for the control of the lucrative East Wast Trade Routes. So I stand by my points, Our Christian brothers in the west have a long history of stabbing us in the back, and continue to do so.

          • Kasomoulis

            Leo,
            You are correct at every point with the fourth crusade however, though history repeats itself if we are not careful, times have changed and Greece is currently between skyla and harivdi. Being stubborn does not make the day. The trees survive the wind because they can bend!
            As much as we want to go back and try to avenge old wrongs, it will not make us any stronger, especially if we turn our back to the west now (it is OK to vent however), I agree. Having declared bankruptcy in 2010 and had gone to the people for a vote and not listen to the Germans may have constituted the “revenge” the west deserved. Now I am not sure of the timing because a bankruptcy now may get the banking rates for borrowing to heights that Greece can in no way afford, (people are used to the current way of living) – just do not believe Russia will save us! I doubt that even Russia will not urge Greece to not do it!
            Cheer up and lift up your heart and spirit my friend, the end is not here yet! Greeks perform best under pressure!

          • http://www.facebook.com/Phoevos Dean Plassaras

            Yes, we do. And don’t even mention the Germans, these Hunnic barbarians and cousins of the Mongols and Tartars.

          • Dnesys

            We need to take a step back as I’m with Leonidas from the facts perspective and kosmoulis you raise good points about our current situation.

            Especially:
            “just do not believe Russia will save us! I doubt that even Russia will not urge Greece to not do it!”

            We save ourselves. But we need to add Russia to the mix of troika, american, israeli etc etc.

            @ Dean: You seems to think Im anti Jew. This is not the case at all. I do not know what your background is however as I do have a sphere of interest (and call Greece Eastern) is for what i stand as a Greek Orthodox Christian, and as I do not like to label I would say by your comments about West of Persia is a Zionist tag.

            I have many Jewish friends that follow the torah and are appaled as to what is going on in Israel.

            They tell me stories of how they lived side by side with Palestinians for many many years and the state of affairs at present can not be rationed other than a Zionist ideal that is against GOD.

            I do not force Religion on anyone and you do not have to see it my way… however when people state that Greece should continue on its path without re-evaluating and just blindly go along is just plain lunacy. It is what has gotten us into our current predicament.

            As kosmoulis said we are between a rock and a hard place.

            This is leading us to abandon it all and go with Russia (and this may be a good/bad thing) however look at the actions of the west of late and you tell me is it an action of a friend, an ally?

            So as I do take your comments and research them further.

            Where did you get this information?

            “Patriarchs later proclaiming “better the turban of the Turk than the tiara of the Pope”. And thus basically delivered Byzantium to the Turks.”?

            “It’s that intense dislike and the schism of the two Christian Churches which is more responsible for the 400 years under Turkish yoke”?

            You speak only of political differences and not that of faith (research the 3 main points of difference – Plus the liturgical) , and dismiss our Church as something of a past relic. It seems that you need to be educated about Greek people and be in Greece on the 14-16 of August… Be in Greece during Easter…. and then you tell me if our church is a relic and not central to who we are as a people.

          • http://www.facebook.com/Phoevos Dean Plassaras

            I come directly from the ancient people of Sparta and Athens.

            I have no idea what happened to you during Roman slavery and I have no interest in learning it now.

            If you don’t recognize in those customs of August the 15th the same ancient rituals of worship towards Goddess Athena or Hera or Artemis or Aphrodite, then you are on your own. Or if you don’t recognize that the saint who is the patron of the sea is nothing more than Poseidon, then I have nothing further to say. You are only a modern Greek. You need to become a “thiachronikos” Greek.

            We are not the Middle Ages anymore.

          • Dnesys

            Ok, i dont really understand what you mean and will not push further…

          • http://www.facebook.com/Phoevos Dean Plassaras

            Leonidas:

            All you doing with the above(which BTW, I don’t dispute) is to reaffirm the stupidity of the Byzantine elite which basically gave the keys to sack Constantinople and later also handed the empire to the Turks.

            The same stupid people, blinded by their own ambition of high office and becoming traitors to their own kind. And all of this so that some of them could behave as top dog.

            Don’t get me started with this corrupt society called Byzantium. I am deeply ashamed of their conduct and corrupt morals which have nothing to do with Hellenism.

    • Lykourgos Stokas

      Not all poms are bad. what about Byron? What about Admiral Codrington, who destroyed the Ottoman Fleet at Navarino?

  • Friend of Cyprus

    It really amazes me to see how you have a predelection to blame everybody but yourselves. There are as many Greek and Turkish Cypriots living in Great Britain and USA as there are on the island. Why is that do you think?

    • Tyroneez

      @friend of Cyprus above
      Cypriots emigrated in the 1950s because as a colony Cyprus was too poor and under-developed to provide jobs and a liveing for all it’s people …
      And that was due to lack of investment by the british colonial system …
      As by definition a colony has to make a profit for the colonial power …
      £100 million per annum to be exact …
      Paud to the British colonial office by the taxes levied on the unfortunate Cypriot people …

      • kasomoulis

        welcome back Ty.

        • Tyroneez

          @kasomoulis above
          Thanks b / someone has to tell some of these ignorant fools the historical facts …
          LOL
          Ha ha ha

    • Kasomoulis

      Friend of cyprus,

      Well sir, you must be one of those “friends of Cyprus” that
      believe Britain is a freedom and liberty loving nation that advocates these properties
      for all humans since the beginning of time! I only wish u leave out the US even
      if you mention her next to Britain only to support the point for your amazement.

      Forgive me if I cannot see the source of your amazement since
      there are still British bases in Cyprus. We are working on it to throw them out
      some day!